Wars of Aggression

Hit them first before they hit us. That seems to be Bush's theory of international affairs. Of course the Terrorist hit us and then Bush hit them back. Or tried to. Then Bush decided that hitting Iraq before they hit us was the next method of "taking it to the terrorists".

But what about North Korea? They're trying to build nuclear arms. Should we put the smack down on them? We're still at war with them from the Korean War in the early 1950s. We only signed an armistice, no conclusion was ever come to. Hence the DMZ and the American troops still patroling it.

And why didn't Reagan smack down those commie bastards (said tongue in cheek) before they could get us?

Ohhh, yeah, right that whole assured mutual destruction thingie we had going on with the nuclear weapons. Is that why bush isn't putting the smack down on north korea? Or maybe he just thinks asian people can't be terrorists. but then why are they considered a rogue nation?

I wish the USA would stop being a bully and hitting the smaller kids. The smaller kids can hit back, but not as hard, and they risk being shoved into a locker all by themselves and having their lunch money taken away. play by our rules we say, or don't play at all. i'm waiting for when the rest of the world wakes up and decides, like the smaller kids, that they should all just get together and take out this one bully 'cause together their combined force can overwhelm the schoolyard bully.